![compare intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz to phenom 8400 compare intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz to phenom 8400](https://ae01.alicdn.com/kf/HTB1DlmZaEKF3KVjSZFEq6xExFXaH.jpg)
#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s.
![compare intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz to phenom 8400 compare intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz to phenom 8400](https://gamesave.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/battlefiled-3-pc-screenshot-gameplay-www.gamesave.us_-1.jpg)
#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s. #9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6863 +0s. #7 getting avg benchmarks for device 423 +0s. #4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s.
![compare intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz to phenom 8400 compare intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz to phenom 8400](https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-g9eJ8Afl7PU/WIFgyzjuEWI/AAAAAAAALxI/YezXHodPBVIx30xP_-YHeJ0vNtxxXKw6wCLcB/s640/Call%2Bof%2BDuty%2BGhosts%2B%25282%2529.jpg)
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13:13:49 +0200 +0s. Thus, the APU is also suitable for small subnotebooks. The power consumption of the entire SoC is rated at 12 to 25 watts. Only a few current games (as of 2014) are thus playable in low settings, but older and less demanding titels should run flawlessly. The integrated Radeon R4 should be similar to the Beema based Radeon R4 GPU with 128 shaders. Set to 25 Watt, the CPU should be slightly faster than the old A6-6310 and therefore similar performance to a Haswell-based Pentium or ULV Core i3. The processor performance depends on the configured TDP of the SoC. As its predecessor, the chip is manufactured in 28 nm. This leads to a more responsive system and better overall performance. However, AMD managed to reduce the leakage current, enabling significantly higher (boost) clock speeds. Neither the performance per clock nor the feature set (including SSE up to 4.2, AVX and AES) have been modified. The top model A8-7410 of Carrizo-L in comparison clocks 100 MHz higher and supports DDR3L-1866.Ĭarrizo-L, Beema (for notebooks) and Mullins (for tablets and compact subnotebooks, same die) are based on AMD's Puma+ architecture, which is the successor to the previous Jaguar design (Kabini and Temash APUs). The predecessor AMD A6-6310 features similar specifications except maybe a changed base clock, the configurable TDP, and the new FP4 package (compatible to the mainstream Carrizo SoCs). The TDP of the A6-7310 can be configured from 12 to 25 Watt. In addition to 4 CPU cores clocked at up to 2.4 GHz (boost clock), the 28 nanometer chip also integrates a Radeon R4 GPU, a single-channel DDR3L-1866 memory controller and the southbridge with various I/O-ports. Core 2 Extreme QX9770 (4x3.The AMD A6-7310 is a mobile quad-core SoC (codenamed "Carrizo-L") for entry-level devices and subnotebooks, which has been presented in May 2015.They don't drop that many FPS so AMD has priced them to be better value. Interestingly, despite the fact that we all know the Core 2 Quads perform better than AMD Phenom X4s, the AMD's turn out to be really great value CPUs simply because of their price. Without overclocking the other Core i7's don't provide anywhere near as good value here either - the i7 920 at only 2.66GHz loses about 10 percent in value but the more expensive i7 940 and 965 drop a significant amount. While the Core i7 920 at 4GHz is undoubtedly faster than the Phenom X4 9750, but since the i7 920 costs $284 versus $164 for the Phenom X4, the offset in price only affords it to a 3 percent better value in price : performance stakes. The Q6600 with DDR2 and DDR3 isn't far behind in the mid-20 percent range, and even the stock E8500 is a positive +20 percent value.
#Compare intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz to phenom 8400 full#
With a full 36-40 percent better price : performance margin the dual core E8400 compared to the baseline Phenom X4 9750. In Crysis the relative CPU value of the highly overclocked E8400 at 4GHz is a clear winner here - with the performance of DDR3 taking the crown although DDR2 isn't far behind.
![compare intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz to phenom 8400 compare intel core 2 duo 2.4 ghz to phenom 8400](https://gamesave.us/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Need-for-Speed-Most-Wanted-2012.www_.gamesave.us-4.jpg)
AMD Phenom X4 9850 OC (4x3GHz, 2.0GHz HTT).Crysis 1680x1050 0AA 0AF, All High Settings